A brief summary of this page
Read the legal content of this page in seconds; the key points and specific details are gathered in a short summary.
This page explains, with reference to statutes and court decisions, how divorce proceedings work in Adana. A divorce by mutual consent requires the marriage to have lasted at least one year and the judge to hear the parties in person (Turkish Civil Code, TMK, Art. 166/3); in a contested divorce, fault is proven by lawfully obtained evidence (Code of Civil Procedure, HMK, Art. 189/2). In the liquidation of the matrimonial property regime, each spouse claims half of the other's net surplus, and value is determined as at the time of liquidation (TMK Art. 235/1). In custody, the criterion is the interests of the child. The Constitutional Court has annulled the phrase providing for indefinite maintenance in TMK Art. 175, and the annulment enters into force on 30.06.2027. Rights of action arising from divorce must be exercised within one year from the finality of the judgment (TMK Art. 178). At YBS Hukuk, files are handled by Av. Yakup Buğrahan SEVDİ.
This summary is provided for general information purposes. Specific legal matters require individual assessment.
Adana Divorce Lawyer | Av. Y. Buğrahan SEVDİ & YBS Hukuk
An Adana divorce lawyer files divorce actions, whether by mutual consent or contested, before the Family Court and conducts claims concerning custody, maintenance, compensation, the liquidation of the matrimonial property regime and wedding jewellery (ziynet alacağı) within a single plan. At YBS Hukuk Adana Law Office, divorce files are handled by the founding lawyer Av. Yakup Buğrahan SEVDİ; the legal basis is the Turkish Civil Code (TMK) No. 4721, the Code of Civil Procedure (HMK) No. 6100 and, where necessary, Law No. 6284 on the Protection of the Family and the Prevention of Violence against Women.
A divorce action seeks answers to two questions: can the union of marriage be ended on a ground recognised by law, and how are the consequences of the divorce for the children and the property to be regulated? The general ground for divorce is set out in TMK Art. 166/1 as follows: "Evlilik birliği, ortak hayatı sürdürmeleri kendilerinden beklenmeyecek derecede temelinden sarsılmış olursa, eşlerden her biri boşanma davası açabilir." "If the union of marriage has been so fundamentally shaken that the spouses cannot be expected to continue their common life, either spouse may file an action for divorce." (unofficial translation) The law also recognises special grounds for divorce for adultery (Art. 161), attempt on life, severe maltreatment or degrading conduct (Art. 162), commission of a degrading offence or living a dishonourable life (Art. 163), abandonment (Art. 164) and mental illness (Art. 165). In most files, the outcome of the case is determined not by the name of the ground but by the evidence with which, and the time within which, the events on which that ground rests are presented to the court.
The special rules of evidence in divorce proceedings are listed in TMK Art. 184. According to the first subparagraph, "Hakim, boşanma veya ayrılık davasının dayandığı olguların varlığına vicdanen kanaat getirmedikçe, bunları ispatlanmış sayamaz." "The judge may not regard the facts on which an action for divorce or separation is based as proven unless satisfied in conscience of their existence." (unofficial translation); according to the third subparagraph, "Tarafların bu konudaki her türlü ikrarları hakimi bağlamaz." "Admissions of any kind made by the parties on this matter do not bind the judge." (unofficial translation) The other party's acceptance of the allegations is not in itself regarded as sufficient for a divorce judgment. In our Adana lawyer practice, we match every event in the statement of claim with a date, a place, a witness and a document, and we do not include abstract or hearsay accounts in the petition. Setting out the evidence in full in the statement of claim is the most important preparatory work in the file, because the possibility of raising new facts and evidence at later stages of the proceedings is limited.
How an Adana Contested Divorce Lawyer Proves Fault
In a contested divorce, fault is proven by the spouse who alleges it, through lawfully obtained evidence. TMK Art. 6 sets out the general rule: "Kanunda aksine bir hüküm bulunmadıkça, taraflardan her biri, hakkını dayandırdığı olguların varlığını ispatla yükümlüdür." "Unless otherwise provided by law, each party is obliged to prove the existence of the facts on which it bases its right." (unofficial translation) A contested divorce is a case in which the spouses cannot agree on the divorce itself or on its consequences, such as custody, maintenance, compensation and the division of property, and which therefore requires the judge's discretion. The most common problem in files in Adana is evidence obtained by unlawful means.
"Hukuka aykırı olarak elde edilmiş olan deliller, mahkeme tarafından bir vakıanın ispatında dikkate alınamaz."
"Evidence obtained unlawfully may not be taken into account by the court in proving a fact." (Unofficial translation)
As an Adana law office, we base the work of proof on official and verifiable records. In allegations of infidelity, we request that hotel accommodation records, bank and credit card transactions and communication traffic (HTS) records be obtained through the court; we include in the file, or leave out, each screenshot and recording held by the client according to how it was obtained. Publicly accessible social media posts and witness statements may also be submitted to the court for assessment; under TMK Art. 184/4, "Hakim, kanıtları serbestçe takdir eder." "The judge assesses the evidence freely." (unofficial translation)
The seriousness of the fault directly affects not only the divorce judgment but also the financial claims. Under TMK Art. 174/1, pecuniary compensation may be claimed by "kusursuz veya daha az kusurlu taraf" "the party not at fault or less at fault" (unofficial translation); under TMK Art. 175, post-divorce maintenance (yoksulluk nafakası, maintenance for the spouse who would fall into poverty because of the divorce) is awarded to the party who would fall into poverty "kusuru daha ağır olmamak koşuluyla" "provided that their fault is not greater" (unofficial translation). For this reason, the allocation of fault is monitored separately at every stage, from the statement of claim to the hearing at which judgment is delivered.
Adana Lawyer for the Liquidation of the Matrimonial Property Regime: Participation Claim and Value Increase Share
If the spouses have not concluded a matrimonial property agreement, the regime of participation in acquired property (edinilmiş mallara katılma rejimi, the statutory default regime under which each spouse shares in the property acquired during the marriage) is liquidated on divorce, and each spouse may claim half of the other's net surplus (participation claim, katılma alacağı). Under TMK Art. 202, "Eşler arasında edinilmiş mallara katılma rejiminin uygulanması asıldır." "As a rule, the regime of participation in acquired property applies between spouses." (unofficial translation); under TMK Art. 236/1, "Her eş veya mirasçıları, diğer eşe ait artık değerin yarısı üzerinde hak sahibi olurlar." "Each spouse or their heirs are entitled to half of the net surplus belonging to the other spouse." (unofficial translation) Acquired property, as defined in TMK Art. 219/1, means "her eşin bu mal rejiminin devamı süresince karşılığını vererek elde ettiği malvarlığı değerleri" "the assets acquired by each spouse for consideration during the continuation of this property regime" (unofficial translation); a home, a vehicle and savings purchased with salary and commercial earnings fall into this group.
The personal property excluded from liquidation is listed item by item in TMK Art. 220: items used exclusively for the personal use of one spouse; assets belonging to one spouse at the beginning of the property regime or subsequently acquired by inheritance or otherwise free of charge; claims for non-pecuniary compensation; and assets replacing personal property. Under TMK Art. 225/2, on divorce the matrimonial property regime "dava tarihinden geçerli olmak üzere sona erer" "ends with effect from the date of the action" (unofficial translation); valuation is carried out under TMK Art. 235/1: "Mal rejiminin sona erdiği sırada mevcut olan edinilmiş mallar, tasfiye anındaki değerleriyle hesaba katılırlar." "Acquired property existing at the time the property regime ends is taken into account at its value at the time of liquidation." (unofficial translation) In its decision 2024/10251 E. 2025/12020 K., the 2nd Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation, applying this provision, required the current market value (sürüm (rayiç) değeri) to be determined as at the date closest to the date of the new judgment following reversal (decision below).
Where one spouse has contributed to the acquisition, improvement or preservation of an asset belonging to the other without receiving any consideration or adequate consideration, a value increase share (değer artış payı) comes into play. TMK Art. 227/1 recognises this claim "katkısı oranında" "in proportion to the contribution" (unofficial translation) and states that "bu alacak o malın tasfiye sırasındaki değerine göre hesaplanır" "this claim is calculated according to the value of that asset at the time of liquidation" (unofficial translation). For example, where gold jewellery given at the wedding is sold and the proceeds are spent on renovating the other spouse's home, this falls within the scope of the claim to the extent that it is documented. Our Adana participation and property division law office prepares the title deed, bank and loan records for examination by the court-appointed expert in the calculation and shows the client's contribution with documents.
An action for the liquidation of the matrimonial property regime may be filed together with the divorce action or separately. As regards the limitation period, the earlier reversal decision quoted in decision 2023/9251 E. 2024/3328 K. of the 2nd Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation stated "mal rejiminin tasfiyesine yönelik davalarda on yıllık zamanaşımı süresinin geçerli olduğu" "that a ten-year limitation period applies in actions for the liquidation of the matrimonial property regime" (unofficial translation) and that the period runs from the date on which the divorce judgment became final; the general basis is Art. 146 of the Turkish Code of Obligations (TBK): "Kanunda aksine bir hüküm bulunmadıkça, her alacak on yıllık zamanaşımına tabidir." "Unless otherwise provided by law, every claim is subject to a ten-year limitation period." (unofficial translation) If there is a risk of assets being concealed, interim measures under TMK Art. 169 should be requested as soon as the action is filed, together with a decision under TMK Art. 199 that dispositions over certain assets may be made only with the other spouse's consent; for immovable property, this decision is annotated in the title deed register.
Adana Custody Lawyer: The Best Interests of the Child and Pedagogical Criteria
The court decides which parent will have custody on the basis of the child's interests; the parents' income level or their fault in the divorce is not decisive on its own. Under TMK Art. 182/1, when deciding on the divorce, the court, "olanak bulundukça ana ve babayı dinledikten" "after hearing the mother and father where possible" (unofficial translation), "ana ve babanın haklarını ve çocuk ile olan kişisel ilişkilerini düzenler." "regulates the rights of the mother and father and their personal relations with the child." (unofficial translation) Under TMK Art. 336/3, on divorce, custody "çocuk kendisine bırakılan tarafa aittir." "belongs to the party to whom the child is entrusted." (unofficial translation) The law ties custody to the child's interests: TMK Art. 182/2 makes even a change of custody possible only "çocuğun menfaatine aykırı olmamak kaydıyla" "provided that it is not contrary to the child's interests" (unofficial translation), and under TMK Art. 339/1, "Ana ve baba, çocuğun bakım ve eğitimi konusunda onun menfaatini göz önünde tutarak gerekli kararları alır ve uygularlar." "The mother and father take and implement the necessary decisions concerning the care and education of the child, having regard to the child's interests." (unofficial translation) Personal relations between the child and the spouse who has not been granted custody are a separate arrangement, and under TMK Art. 182/3, in this arrangement "çocuğun özellikle sağlık, eğitim ve ahlak bakımından yararları esas tutulur." "the interests of the child, particularly in terms of health, education and morals, are taken as the basis." (unofficial translation)
The Adana Family Courts have the professional assessment carried out under Article 5 of Law No. 4787; for this assessment, the court draws on the "psikolog, pedagog ve sosyal çalışmacılardan" "psychologists, pedagogues and social workers" (unofficial translation) assigned to the courthouse. The resulting social investigation report assesses with which parent the child will lead a more stable life, school and health follow-up, sibling relationships and the parents' capacity to provide care. TMK Art. 182 does not set an age limit for the age of discernment; in a decision upheld by the 2nd Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation, the reasoning of the Regional Court of Appeal took into account both the will and the best interests of a child who had reached the age of discernment (see 2024/2986 E. 2024/5319 K. below).
A change of custody is a separate action filed when circumstances change after the divorce. Under TMK Art. 183, "Ana veya babanın başkasıyla evlenmesi, başka bir yere gitmesi veya ölmesi gibi yeni olguların zorunlu kılması halinde hakim, re'sen veya ana ve babadan birinin istemi üzerine gerekli önlemleri alır." "Where new facts, such as the mother or father marrying another person, moving to another place or dying, make it necessary, the judge takes the necessary measures of their own motion or at the request of either parent." (unofficial translation) Obstruction of personal relations is also a frequent basis for these actions; under TMK Art. 182/2, in its judgment the court "kişisel ilişki düzenlemesinin gereklerinin yerine getirilmemesi halinde, çocuğun menfaatine aykırı olmamak kaydıyla velayetin değiştirilebileceğini ihtar eder." "gives a warning that, if the requirements of the arrangement for personal relations are not complied with, custody may be changed, provided that this is not contrary to the child's interests." (unofficial translation) In these files, our Adana custody law office avoids evidentiary routes that would force the child to take sides and informs the court of the scope of the professionals' report through specific questions.
Adana Maintenance and Compensation Lawyer
Three types of maintenance arise in divorce: interim maintenance (tedbir nafakası, maintenance ordered while the proceedings continue), awarded for the duration of the proceedings; post-divorce maintenance, awarded to the spouse who would fall into poverty because of the divorce; and child support (iştirak nafakası, the contribution of the parent without custody to the child's expenses) for the child's care and education expenses; in addition, the parents' duty of support continues while a child who has reached majority is in education (TMK Art. 328/2). The basis of interim maintenance is TMK Art. 169: for the duration of the proceedings, the judge "eşlerin barınmasına, geçimine, eşlerin mallarının yönetimine ve çocukların bakım ve korunmasına ilişkin geçici önlemleri re'sen alır." "takes, of their own motion, the interim measures concerning the accommodation and subsistence of the spouses, the management of the spouses' property and the care and protection of the children." (unofficial translation) Child support is based on TMK Art. 182/3: the spouse who has not been granted custody "çocuğun bakım ve eğitim giderlerine gücü oranında katılmak zorundadır." "is obliged to contribute to the child's care and education expenses in proportion to their means." (unofficial translation)
"Boşanma yüzünden yoksulluğa düşecek taraf, kusuru daha ağır olmamak koşuluyla geçimi için diğer taraftan mali gücü oranında süresiz olarak nafaka isteyebilir. Nafaka yükümlüsünün kusuru aranmaz."
"The party who would fall into poverty as a result of the divorce may, provided that their fault is not greater, claim maintenance for an indefinite period from the other party for their subsistence, in proportion to the other party's financial means. Fault on the part of the person liable for maintenance is not required." (Unofficial translation)
An important development concerning indefinite maintenance took place in 2026: the Constitutional Court annulled the phrase "süresiz olarak" "for an indefinite period" (unofficial translation) in TMK Art. 175 and decided that the annulment would enter into force nine months after its publication in the Official Gazette. Since the decision was published in the Official Gazette dated 30.09.2026, the annulment enters into force nine months after that date, that is, on 30.06.2027. The text of the article remains in force until 30.06.2027; whether the legislature will adopt a new regulation, and the effect on pending files, should be monitored separately.
In its decision dated 04.06.2026, E. 2025/156, K. 2026/131 (Official Gazette 30.9.2026, Issue 33386; referring court by way of objection: Antalya 12th Family Court), the Constitutional Court ruled as follows on the phrase "süresiz olarak" "for an indefinite period" (unofficial translation) in post-divorce maintenance:
"22/11/2001 tarihli ve 4721 sayılı Türk Medeni Kanunu'nun 175. maddesinin birinci fıkrasında yer alan "...süresiz olarak..." ibaresinin Anayasa'ya aykırı olduğuna ve İPTALİNE, Engin YILDIRIM, Selahaddin MENTEŞ ile Kenan YAŞAR'ın karşıoyları ve OYÇOKLUĞUYLA, iptal hükmünün Anayasa'nın 153. maddesinin üçüncü fıkrası ile 30/3/2011 tarihli ve 6216 sayılı Anayasa Mahkemesinin Kuruluşu ve Yargılama Usulleri Hakkında Kanun'un 66. maddesinin (3) numaralı fıkrası gereğince KARARIN RESMİ GAZETE'DE YAYIMLANMASINDAN BAŞLAYARAK DOKUZ AY SONRA YÜRÜRLÜĞE GİRMESİNE OYBİRLİĞİYLE 4/6/2026 tarihinde karar verildi."Unofficial translation
"It was decided on 4/6/2026 that the phrase "...for an indefinite period..." in the first paragraph of Article 175 of the Turkish Civil Code dated 22/11/2001 and numbered 4721 is contrary to the Constitution and that it be ANNULLED, BY MAJORITY VOTE, with the dissenting votes of Engin YILDIRIM, Selahaddin MENTEŞ and Kenan YAŞAR, and UNANIMOUSLY that, pursuant to the third paragraph of Article 153 of the Constitution and paragraph (3) of Article 66 of Law No. 6216 dated 30/3/2011 on the Establishment and Rules of Procedure of the Constitutional Court, THE ANNULMENT SHALL ENTER INTO FORCE NINE MONTHS AFTER THE PUBLICATION OF THE DECISION IN THE OFFICIAL GAZETTE."
Post-divorce maintenance and pecuniary compensation may be paid as a lump sum or in the form of periodic payments. Under TMK Art. 176, maintenance in the form of periodic payments "alacaklı tarafın yeniden evlenmesi ya da taraflardan birinin ölümü halinde kendiliğinden kalkar" "ends automatically if the receiving party remarries or if either party dies" (unofficial translation); where the recipient is found to be "evlenme olmaksızın fiilen evliymiş gibi yaşaması, yoksulluğunun ortadan kalkması ya da haysiyetsiz hayat sürmesi halinde" "living as if actually married without marrying, no longer in poverty or living a dishonourable life" (unofficial translation), it is terminated by a court decision. Under the same article, "Tarafların mali durumlarının değişmesi veya hakkaniyetin gerektirdiği hallerde iradın artırılması veya azaltılmasına karar verilebilir." "Where the financial circumstances of the parties change or where equity so requires, an increase or reduction of the periodic payment may be ordered." (unofficial translation); this provision is the basis for actions to increase or reduce maintenance.
If the child's education continues after the child has reached majority, the parents' duty of support continues. Under TMK Art. 328/2, "Çocuk ergin olduğu halde eğitimi devam ediyorsa, ana ve baba durum ve koşullara göre kendilerinden beklenebilecek ölçüde olmak üzere, eğitimi sona erinceye kadar çocuğa bakmakla yükümlüdürler." "If the child's education continues after the child has reached majority, the mother and father are obliged to support the child until the education ends, to the extent that can be expected of them in the circumstances." (unofficial translation) Family support maintenance (yardım nafakası), on the other hand, is a separate institution regulated in TMK Art. 364/1 and relates not to divorce but to kinship: "Herkes, yardım etmediği takdirde yoksulluğa düşecek olan üstsoyu ve altsoyu ile kardeşlerine nafaka vermekle yükümlüdür." "Everyone is obliged to provide maintenance to their ascendants, descendants and siblings who would fall into poverty without their assistance." (unofficial translation)
Compensation in divorce is of two kinds. Under TMK Art. 174/1, "Mevcut veya beklenen menfaatleri boşanma yüzünden zedelenen kusursuz veya daha az kusurlu taraf, kusurlu taraftan uygun bir maddi tazminat isteyebilir." "The party not at fault or less at fault whose existing or expected interests are impaired by the divorce may claim appropriate pecuniary compensation from the party at fault." (unofficial translation); under Art. 174/2, "Boşanmaya sebep olan olaylar yüzünden kişilik hakkı saldırıya uğrayan taraf, kusurlu olan diğer taraftan manevi tazminat olarak uygun miktarda bir para ödenmesini isteyebilir." "The party whose personality rights have been infringed by the events that caused the divorce may claim from the other party at fault payment of an appropriate sum of money as non-pecuniary compensation." (unofficial translation) The judge determines the amount at their discretion according to the seriousness of the events in the file and the circumstances of the parties. For unpaid maintenance, the remedy under Art. 344 of the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Law (İcra ve İflas Kanunu, İİK) is available: "Nafakaya ilişkin kararların gereğini yerine getirmeyen borçlunun, alacaklının şikayeti üzerine, üç aya kadar tazyik hapsine karar verilir." "A debtor who fails to comply with decisions concerning maintenance shall, upon the creditor's complaint, be ordered to undergo coercive imprisonment of up to three months." (unofficial translation)
Case Law Analyses in Family Law
1. Sex-Specific Items Among Wedding Jewellery and Ownership by the Spouse to Whom They Were Given
In its decision dated 11.12.2025, E. 2025/4787, K. 2025/11126, the 2nd Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation set out its view of principle on the ownership of wedding jewellery as follows:
"Aksi takdirde erkeğe ve kadına takılan/verilen ve ekonomik değer taşıyan her şey kural olarak kendilerine aittir. Ne var ki takılar içinde karşı cinse özgü (kadına ya da erkeğe özgü) bir şey varsa o cinse verilmiş sayılır. ... Bilirkişi incelemesi sonucunda o şeyin her iki cinse özgü olduğu belirlenmişse o şey takılan/verilen eşe ait olur. ... 2.İlk Derece Mahkemesi kararının BOZULMASINA, ... 11.12.2025 tarihinde oy birliğiyle karar verildi."Unofficial translation
"Otherwise, as a rule, everything of economic value placed on or given to the man and to the woman belongs to them. However, if the jewellery includes an item specific to one sex (specific to women or to men), it is deemed to have been given to that sex. ... If, as a result of the examination by the court-appointed expert, the item is found to be suitable for both sexes, it belongs to the spouse on whom it was placed or to whom it was given. ... 2. REVERSAL of the judgment of the Court of First Instance, ... it was decided unanimously on 11.12.2025."
The decision applies sequential criteria to the ownership of wedding jewellery: first, the agreement between the parties is examined; if there is no agreement, the local custom and practice alleged and proven; and, failing that, the person to whom the item was given and its type. Jewellery suitable for both sexes is allocated not according to the person who gave it but according to the spouse on whom it was placed or to whom it was given. On the basis of this principle, the Chamber regarded the award of all the jewellery to the woman, without separating the items given to the man, as a ground for reversal. For this reason, in a wedding jewellery action, an item-by-item list of the jewellery taken from the wedding footage, the type of each item and the spouse to whom it was given should be set out separately in the statement of claim.
2. The Will of a Child Who Has Reached the Age of Discernment in an Action to Extend Personal Relations
2nd Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation, E. 2024/2986, K. 2024/5319, dated 04.07.2024 (the reasoning of the Regional Court of Appeal as quoted in the decision of the Court of Cassation)
"...dosya kapsamı, mevcut delil durumu ve ileri sürülen istinaf sebepleri ile re'sen bakılacak kamu düzenini ilgilendiren hususlar ve özellikle idrak çağındaki çocuğun iradesi ile üstün menfaati dikkate alındığında, İlk Derece Mahkemesinin vakıa ve hukuki değerlendirmesinde usul ve esas yönünden yasaya aykırılık bulunmadığı, İlk Derece Mahkemesinin gerekçenin de isabetli olduğu gerekçesi ile davacının istinaf talebinin esastan reddine karar verilmiştir."Unofficial translation
"...having regard to the content of the file, the state of the existing evidence, the grounds of appeal raised and the matters concerning public order to be examined of the court's own motion, and in particular to the will and best interests of the child who has reached the age of discernment, it was decided to dismiss the claimant's appeal on the merits, on the ground that there was no unlawfulness in terms of procedure or substance in the assessment of the facts and the law by the Court of First Instance and that the reasoning of the Court of First Instance was also correct."
The claimant father requested, primarily, a change of custody and, if that request was not accepted, an increase in the days of personal relations. The Regional Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal on the merits, having regard to the will and best interests of the child who had reached the age of discernment, and the Court of Cassation upheld the dismissal of the request to extend the duration of personal relations. What the decision shows us is this: where an extension of personal relations is requested, the child's own will is a serious criterion. In our custody and personal relations files, we request that the child be heard with the assistance of a professional and that the child's statement be assessed free from any parental influence.
3. Current Market Value in the Liquidation of the Matrimonial Property Regime
In its decision dated 25.12.2025, E. 2024/10251, K. 2025/12020, the 2nd Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation held as follows on determining the value of immovable property in liquidation:
"...tasfiye konusu taşınmazın tasfiye (önceki karar bozulmakla değer güncelliğini yitirdiğinden bozma sonrası yeni karar tarihine en yakın tarihteki) tarihi itibariyle sürüm (rayiç) değerleri belirlendikten sonra, belirlenecek değere göre hesaplanacak artık değere katılma alacağının kabulüne karar verilmesi gerekirken, yazılı şekilde karar verilmesi hatalı olmuş, bozmayı gerektirmiştir. ... 2. Temyiz olunan İlk Derece Mahkemesi kararının yukarıda (1.b.) ve (1.c.) bentlerinde açıklanan sebeplerle BOZULMASINA, ... 25.12.2025 tarihinde oy birliğiyle karar verildi."Unofficial translation
"...whereas, after establishing the current market values of the immovable property subject to liquidation as at the date of liquidation (since the previous decision lost the currency of its values upon reversal, the date closest to the date of the new judgment following reversal), it should have been decided to accept the participation claim in the net surplus calculated according to the value so established, deciding as written was erroneous and required reversal. ... 2. REVERSAL of the judgment of the Court of First Instance subject to the appeal to the Court of Cassation for the reasons explained in subparagraphs (1.b.) and (1.c.) above, ... it was decided unanimously on 25.12.2025."
The court of first instance had made its calculation on the basis of the value of the immovable property determined about one and a half years before the date of judgment; the Chamber found this calculation contrary to the "tasfiye anındaki değer" "value at the time of liquidation" (unofficial translation) rule in TMK Art. 235/1. The practical consequence is clear: in periods when property values change quickly, deciding on the basis of an old court-appointed expert report leaves the participation claim below its real value. In matrimonial property regime files, as the judgment stage approaches and in files returning after reversal, we request an up-to-date valuation.
4. Closure of the "Rectification of Decision" Remedy and the Process of Finality of the Judgment
2nd Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation, E. 2025/9638, K. 2025/10793, dated 08.12.2025
"...bölge adliye mahkemelerinin göreve başladığı 20.07.2016 tarihinden sonra anılan mahkemelerce verilen kararların temyizi üzerine Yargıtayca tesis edilen kararlar hakkında 6100 sayılı Kanun'da karar düzeltme yoluna başvurulabileceğine dair bir düzenleme bulunmamaktadır."Unofficial translation
"...Law No. 6100 contains no provision allowing an application for rectification of decision against the decisions rendered by the Court of Cassation upon appeal against decisions given by the regional courts of appeal after 20.07.2016, the date on which those courts began to operate."
Where a decision given by the Regional Court of Appeal after 20.07.2016 is upheld by the Court of Cassation, no ordinary legal remedy remains available in a family case, and a petition for rectification of decision (karar düzeltme) is rejected. The files in which the old procedure continues are those covered by HMK Provisional Art. 3/2, namely decisions given before the regional courts of appeal began to operate. The practical consequence is this: petitions for appeal and for appeal to the Court of Cassation are a one-time opportunity; all objections must be raised in these petitions, within the time limit and with reasons.
Sample Contested Divorce Statement of Claim with Requests for Custody and Interim Measures (Draft)
The sample below has been prepared to show the legal structure of a contested divorce statement of claim; the information in square brackets is completed according to the specific facts, and each event is written together with its own evidence.
TO THE ADANA FAMILY COURT ON DUTY
CLAIMANT: [Name Surname] (Turkish Identity No: ...)
ADDRESS: [Full Address]
COUNSEL: Av. Yakup Buğrahan SEVDİ, [Office Address]
RESPONDENT: [Name Surname] (Turkish Identity No: ...)
ADDRESS: [Full Address]
SUBJECT OF THE ACTION: Comprises the requests for DIVORCE on the ground of the fundamental breakdown of the union of marriage (TMK Art. 166/1), CUSTODY of the joint children, monthly INTERIM MAINTENANCE and CHILD SUPPORT of ... TL, monthly INTERIM MAINTENANCE and POST-DIVORCE MAINTENANCE of ... TL, PECUNIARY COMPENSATION of ... TL and NON-PECUNIARY COMPENSATION of ... TL, and the imposition of an INTERIM INJUNCTION on the respondent's assets.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
1. THE UNION OF MARRIAGE AND THE PARTIES: The client and the respondent married on .../.../.... and have two joint children from this marriage, born in ... and ....
2. GROUNDS FOR DIVORCE (FACTS ESTABLISHING FAULT): a) Infidelity: The respondent spouse breached the duty of fidelity while the union of marriage continued; the hotel records (Annex 1) and HTS records (Annex 2), which we request be obtained, will show that the respondent met a third person regularly and stayed at the ... Hotel on .... b) Economic Violence: The respondent does not provide for the household, has taken control of the client's salary card and spends the family budget on gambling (Annex 3: bank account statements). c) Physical Violence: On .../.../...., the respondent used physical violence against the client; the incident is documented by the medical report of injury obtained from the hospital (Annex 4) and by the law enforcement reports (Annex 5).
3. REQUEST FOR CUSTODY: Taking into account together the interests of the joint children (TMK Art. 339/1, Art. 182/2) and the respondent's tendency towards violence, custody should be granted to the client (TMK Art. 182/1, Art. 336/3), and personal relations between the respondent and the children should be arranged having regard to the children's interests in terms of health, education and morals (TMK Art. 182/3); we request that a social investigation report be obtained.
4. MAINTENANCE AND COMPENSATION: The client has no regular income. Because of the respondent's culpable conduct, the union of marriage can no longer be sustained, and the client's personality rights have been harmed. The social and economic circumstances of the parties should be investigated and maintenance and compensation should be awarded.
5. REQUEST FOR AN INTERIM INJUNCTION: It has come to our knowledge that, upon learning that a divorce action would be filed, the respondent attempted to dispose of their assets. Pursuant to TMK Art. 169 and Art. 199, we request that an INTERIM INJUNCTION be imposed to prevent the transfer to third parties of the vehicle with registration plate ... and the immovable property at block ... parcel ..., registered in the respondent's name.
LEGAL GROUNDS: TMK, HMK, Law No. 6284 and related legislation.
EVIDENCE: Civil registry record, medical report of injury and law enforcement reports, hotel records and HTS records (to be obtained by the court), bank account statements, witness statements, examination by a court-appointed expert, social and economic inquiry and all other evidence permitted by law.
CONCLUSION AND RELIEF SOUGHT: For the reasons set out and explained above, we respectfully submit and request, on behalf of our client, that our action be ACCEPTED and that the court rule for the DIVORCE of the parties, the grant of CUSTODY of the joint children to the client, monthly INTERIM MAINTENANCE of ... TL for the client and the children from the date of the action, to continue as POST-DIVORCE MAINTENANCE and CHILD SUPPORT after the judgment becomes final, PECUNIARY COMPENSATION of ... TL and NON-PECUNIARY COMPENSATION of ... TL in favour of the client owing to the respondent's fault, the imposition of an INTERIM INJUNCTION on the assets registered in the respondent's name, and the imposition of the costs of proceedings and the attorney's fees on the respondent. .../.../2026
Counsel for the Claimant
Av. Yakup Buğrahan SEVDİ
Types of Divorce Action and Legal Procedures
A divorce action follows one of two routes, divorce by mutual consent or contested divorce, depending on whether the spouses agree; on both routes, the judgment is given by the Family Court.
- Divorce by Mutual Consent Actions in Adana: If the marriage has lasted at least one year, the spouses may apply jointly, or one spouse may accept the other's action. The judge hears the parties in person and, if the judge finds appropriate the protocol on the financial consequences of the divorce and the situation of the children, rules for divorce.
- Contested Divorce Actions in Adana: If the parties cannot agree on the divorce or its consequences, the action is filed on the basis of one of the grounds listed between TMK Art. 161 and Art. 166. Allegations such as adultery, attempt on life, abandonment or the fundamental breakdown of the union of marriage are proven by lawfully obtained evidence; because of stages such as hearing witnesses, obtaining records and professional assessment, the proceedings take longer.
"Evlilik en az bir yıl sürmüş ise, eşlerin birlikte başvurması ya da bir eşin diğerinin davasını kabul etmesi halinde, evlilik birliği temelinden sarsılmış sayılır. Bu halde boşanma kararı verilebilmesi için, hakimin tarafları bizzat dinleyerek iradelerinin serbestçe açıklandığına kanaat getirmesi ve boşanmanın mali sonuçları ile çocukların durumu hususunda taraflarca kabul edilecek düzenlemeyi uygun bulması şarttır. Hakim, tarafların ve çocukların menfaatlerini göz önünde tutarak bu anlaşmada gerekli gördüğü değişiklikleri yapabilir. Bu değişikliklerin taraflarca da kabulü halinde boşanmaya hükmolunur."
"If the marriage has lasted at least one year, the union of marriage is deemed to have broken down fundamentally where the spouses apply jointly or one spouse accepts the other's action. In this case, for a divorce judgment to be given, the judge must hear the parties in person and be satisfied that their will has been expressed freely, and must find appropriate the arrangement to be accepted by the parties concerning the financial consequences of the divorce and the situation of the children. The judge may, having regard to the interests of the parties and the children, make the amendments he or she deems necessary to this agreement. If these amendments are also accepted by the parties, divorce is ordered." (Unofficial translation)
The law provides a further, separate route where a divorce action filed earlier has been dismissed. Under TMK Art. 166/4, as amended by Law No. 7532 dated 14.11.2024, "Boşanma sebeplerinden herhangi biriyle açılmış bulunan davanın reddine karar verilmesi ve bu kararın kesinleştiği tarihten başlayarak bir yıl geçmesi halinde, her ne sebeple olursa olsun ortak hayat yeniden kurulamamışsa evlilik birliği temelden sarsılmış sayılır ve eşlerden birinin istemi üzerine boşanmaya karar verilir." "Where an action filed on any of the grounds for divorce has been dismissed and one year has passed from the date on which that decision became final, the union of marriage is deemed to have broken down fundamentally if, for whatever reason, the common life could not be re-established, and divorce is ordered at the request of either spouse." (unofficial translation) The three-year period in the former text no longer applies. In both types of action, working with an Adana family law lawyer ensures that the protocol is written in full and that the evidence is submitted in time; as YBS Hukuk Bürosu, we determine the type of action together with the client according to the state of the evidence in the file.
A Warning from YBS About the Wrong Method: Trying to Prove Your Case with Unlawful Evidence
Audio and video recordings made without the spouse's knowledge may not only be disregarded as evidence but may also lead to a criminal investigation against the spouse who made the recording. Placing a hidden camera in the shared home, installing spyware on a phone or secretly recording private conversations carries the risk of falling within the prohibition on unlawful evidence in HMK Art. 189/2. The same conduct is a separate offence under the Turkish Penal Code:
"Kişilerin özel hayatının gizliliğini ihlal eden kimse, bir yıldan üç yıla kadar hapis cezası ile cezalandırılır. Gizliliğin görüntü veya seslerin kayda alınması suretiyle ihlal edilmesi halinde, verilecek ceza bir kat artırılır."
"A person who violates the privacy of the private life of others shall be punished with imprisonment from one year to three years. Where the privacy is violated by recording images or sounds, the penalty to be imposed shall be doubled." (Unofficial translation)
The most frequent reason why a spouse who is in the right loses the case is trying to document the true information they hold by the wrong means. The right course is to tell the lawyer about the incident and to assess together, before the action is filed, whether the same fact can be proven with official records, a witness or a document to be obtained through the court.
Financial Consequences of Divorce: Division of Property, Maintenance and Compensation
The financial consequences of divorce fall under three headings: the liquidation of the matrimonial property regime, maintenance and compensation. Since the time limits and legal bases of the three differ, the litigation strategy should be built for all of them together from the outset.
- Property Division Action in Adana: If there is no matrimonial property agreement, the regime of participation in acquired property is liquidated; each spouse is entitled to half of the other's net surplus (TMK Art. 236/1). The action may be filed together with the divorce action or after the divorce judgment becomes final; on the limitation period, see the warning above.
- Maintenance Action in Adana: Interim maintenance may be claimed for the duration of the proceedings (TMK Art. 169), post-divorce maintenance for the spouse who would fall into poverty after the divorce (TMK Art. 175), and child support through the contribution of the parent who does not receive custody (TMK Art. 182/3). For a child who has reached majority and is still in education, the parents' duty of support continues under TMK Art. 328/2.
- Compensation Action in Adana: The spouse not at fault or less at fault whose interests are impaired by the divorce may claim pecuniary compensation, and the spouse whose personality rights have been infringed by the events that caused the divorce may claim non-pecuniary compensation (TMK Art. 174).
Which claims are to be raised in the divorce action and which in a separate action matters because of the rules on time limits; this is one of the first issues an Adana divorce action lawyer examines.
Protecting Your Future
Proper preparation before deciding on divorce prevents losses of rights that are difficult to remedy once the action has been filed. Coming to the first meeting with the following information and documents makes it possible to assess the file on the first day:
- Identity and family information: date of marriage, children's dates of birth, school and health information, and the place where the spouses lived together during the last six months (to determine the competent court).
- Income and expense documents: both spouses' payslips, bank account details, rent and loan payments; these are used in calculating the maintenance and compensation claims.
- List of assets: the acquisition dates of immovable property, vehicles, company shares and savings acquired during the marriage; property owned before the marriage and inherited property are noted separately.
- List of events and evidence: the dates of the events constituting the ground for divorce, the names of witnesses and any reports and official records; whether they were obtained lawfully is assessed together at the first meeting.
- Need for urgent protection: if there is violence or threat, the measures under Law No. 6284, and if there is a risk concerning the home, the family home annotation (aile konutu şerhi, a note in the land register restricting disposal of the family home) are planned on the first day.
TMK Art. 194/3 provides clear protection for the family home: "Aile konutu olarak özgülenen taşınmaz malın maliki olmayan eş, tapu kütüğüne konutla ilgili gerekli şerhin verilmesini tapu müdürlüğünden isteyebilir." "The spouse who is not the owner of the immovable property allocated as the family home may request the land registry office to enter the necessary annotation concerning the home in the title deed register." (unofficial translation) The annotation makes it more difficult to transfer the home without the other spouse's express consent. As YBS Hukuk Bürosu, we examine the specific circumstances of each file and prepare a litigation plan together with our clients; you may contact us for information.
Av. Y. Buğrahan SEVDİ Warns: Do Not Miss the Limitation Period for a Property Division Action!
There are two different time limits in divorce, and they must not be confused: the one-year period in TMK Art. 178 for rights of action arising from divorce, and the ten-year period for the liquidation of the matrimonial property regime referred to in a decision of the Court of Cassation (2nd Civil Chamber, 2023/9251 E. 2024/3328 K.).
"Evliliğin boşanma sebebiyle sona ermesinden doğan dava hakları, boşanma hükmünün kesinleşmesinin üzerinden bir yıl geçmekle zamanaşımına uğrar."
"Rights of action arising from the termination of the marriage by divorce become time-barred on the expiry of one year from the date on which the divorce judgment becomes final." (Unofficial translation)
For the participation claim arising from the liquidation of the matrimonial property regime, on the other hand, the reversal decision quoted in decision 2023/9251 E. 2024/3328 K. of the 2nd Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation applied a ten-year limitation period and calculated the period from the date on which the divorce judgment became final. The limitation period produces effects when the other party invokes it; rather than waiting for the period to run, the safest course is to prepare the liquidation claim as soon as the divorce becomes final. There are also peremptory periods for the special grounds for divorce: for grounds such as adultery and attempt on life, the right of action lapses six months after the ground becomes known and, in any event, five years after the event (TMK Art. 161 and Art. 162).
Table: How Is a Divorce by Mutual Consent Obtained and How Does the Process Work?
| Stage | Step | Procedure and Steps | Legal Basis | Our Notes and Recommendations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Preparing the Protocol | The spouses prepare and sign a written protocol on the financial consequences of the divorce (maintenance, compensation, division of property) and the situation of the children (custody, personal relations). | TMK Art. 166/3 | The protocol becomes valid upon approval by the judge (TMK Art. 184/5). The criterion for increasing maintenance, the days and hours of personal relations and the division of belongings should be written clearly. |
| 2 | Filing the Action | The statement of claim and the signed protocol are submitted to the Family Court; the court fees and the advance on costs are paid. | TMK Art. 168; HMK Art. 118/1 | The competent court is the court of the domicile of one of the spouses or of the place where they have lived together for the last six months. "Dava, dava dilekçesinin kaydedildiği tarihte açılmış sayılır." "The action is deemed to have been filed on the date on which the statement of claim is registered." (unofficial translation) |
| 3 | Setting the Hearing Date | The court examines the file, sets a hearing date and notifies the parties. | Court workload | The hearing date depends on the court's calendar; if the file is submitted complete, the need for interim procedural steps is reduced. |
| 4 | Hearing and Judgment | The spouses attend the hearing; the judge asks about their will and the protocol and, if the judge finds them appropriate, rules for divorce. | TMK Art. 166/3 | The judge hears the parties in person. If one of the spouses withdraws from the agreement at the hearing, the case does not conclude as a divorce by mutual consent. |
| 5 | Service of the Reasoned Judgment | The reasoned judgment is written and served on the parties. | HMK Art. 345 | The time limit for appeal begins to run upon service of the judgment on each party. |
| 6 | Finality of the Judgment | If no appeal is lodged within two weeks of service, the judgment becomes final. | HMK Art. 345 | The legal consequences of the divorce arise upon the finality of the judgment; the one-year period in TMK Art. 178 also starts on this date. |
| 7 | Checking the Civil Registry Record | It is checked that the final judgment has been entered in the civil registry record. | Practice note | Whether the marital status has been updated should be checked through the e-Government Gateway (e-Devlet, the state's online public services portal) or at the civil registry office. |
Duration of a Divorce Action and Stages of the Proceedings in Adana
The law does not provide a fixed duration for a divorce action; how long the action will take is determined by service of process, the collection of evidence, professional assessment and the stages of legal remedies. In a divorce by mutual consent, since it is sufficient for the spouses to attend the hearing and for the judge to find the protocol appropriate, the duration mostly depends on when the hearing date is set. In a contested divorce, on the other hand, the proceedings go through stages such as the exchange of written submissions, the hearing of witnesses, the obtaining of records and the social investigation report.
There are two legal remedies after the judgment. Under HMK Art. 345, "İstinaf yoluna başvuru süresi iki haftadır. Bu süre, ilamın usulen taraflardan her birine tebliğiyle işlemeye başlar." "The time limit for applying for an appeal is two weeks. This period begins to run upon the due service of the enforceable judgment (ilam, the written judgment document) on each of the parties." (unofficial translation) For an appeal to the Court of Cassation against the decision of the Regional Court of Appeal, HMK Art. 361/1 also provides a two-week time limit. The lawful way to shorten the duration is to set out the evidence in full in the first petition, to give the witnesses' addresses correctly and to determine from the outset the questions to be the subject of professional assessment. Estimates of duration given without examining the specific file are misleading; we assess the duration of the action at the first meeting according to the state of the evidence in the file.
Adana Family Courts and the Competent Court
A divorce action is heard by the Family Court and is filed in the court of the domicile of one of the spouses or of the place where they have lived together for the last six months. Subject-matter jurisdiction is based on Article 4 of Law No. 4787: Family Courts hear "aile hukukundan doğan dava ve işler" "actions and matters arising from family law" (unofficial translation) within the scope of Book Two of the TMK (excluding Part Three), as well as the recognition and enforcement of foreign court decisions relating to family law. For venue, TMK Art. 168 applies:
"Boşanma veya ayrılık davalarında yetkili mahkeme, eşlerden birinin yerleşim yeri veya davadan önce son defa altı aydan beri birlikte oturdukları yer mahkemesidir."
"In actions for divorce or separation, the competent court is the court of the domicile of one of the spouses or of the place where they last lived together for six months before the action." (Unofficial translation)
If one of the spouses lives in Adana, the action may be filed with the Adana Family Court, and an Adana family court lawyer handles the file here; if the spouses lived together in Adana but have since moved to other provinces, venue is reassessed according to these two criteria. The Family Court is also the deciding authority for preventive measures under Law No. 6284; under Article 2 of that law, in that law "Hakim: Aile mahkemesi hakimini" "Judge: means the judge of the Family Court" (unofficial translation). Confidentiality may also be protected in a divorce action: under TMK Art. 184/6, "Hakim, taraflardan birinin istemi üzerine duruşmanın gizli yapılmasına karar verebilir." "The judge may, at the request of one of the parties, decide that the hearing be held in private." (unofficial translation)
How to Choose the Right Divorce Lawyer in Adana?
The answer to the question "Who is the best divorce lawyer in Adana?" is not a single name, but concrete criteria that each family can measure against its own file. Whether you are looking for an individual lawyer, an Adana divorce law office or an Adana family lawyer, the following questions will guide you when looking for the right and trustworthy lawyer:
- Bar registration: Whether the lawyer is registered with the Adana Bar Association or another bar association can be verified on the official lawyer search pages of the bar association and of the Union of Turkish Bar Associations.
- Experience in family law: Asking about the types of files the lawyer handles before the Family Court (custody, matrimonial property regime, wedding jewellery, Law No. 6284) and the articles the lawyer has published on these subjects is the most direct way of measuring experience.
- Written fee agreement: The scope of the fee (divorce, maintenance, liquidation, legal remedies) should be specified item by item in a written agreement; Attorneyship Law Art. 164 prohibits agreeing a fee below the minimum fee tariff; if the fee is agreed as a percentage of the value of the action, that percentage may not exceed twenty-five per cent.
- Confidentiality and communication: Who will provide information about the file, how updates will be given after hearings and a request for a private hearing (TMK Art. 184/6) should be discussed at the first meeting.
- Realistic assessment: An assessment that promises an outcome or makes firm promises about duration or amount does not reflect the state of the evidence in the file; a reliable assessment states the favourable and unfavourable possibilities together.
At YBS Hukuk, at the first meeting we share in writing the strengths and weaknesses of the file, the evidence required and the scope of the fee. We recommend that you make your choice on the basis of these criteria and by comparing more than one meeting. We have also gathered the questions to ask at the first meeting, with their legal bases, in our guide to choosing a divorce lawyer.
Where Can You Find the Right Divorce Lawyer in Adana?
When looking for the right divorce lawyer or family law lawyer in Adana, the first step is to verify the bar registration of the lawyer you will meet on the official lawyer search page of the Adana Bar Association or of the Union of Turkish Bar Associations. Next, the types of files the lawyer handles before the Family Court, the articles the lawyer has published on these subjects and how the lawyer assesses the state of the evidence in your file at the first meeting are compared. A recommendation from people around you becomes meaningful when assessed together with this information; for someone looking for a family lawyer in Adana, the soundest course is to meet more than one lawyer and set the criteria above side by side.
Adana Divorce Lawyer Fees and Litigation Costs
The fee of an Adana divorce lawyer is agreed in writing between the lawyer and the client and may not be below the Minimum Attorneyship Fee Tariff. Litigation costs (court fees, service of process, court-appointed expert and witness expenses), on the other hand, are separate from the lawyer's fee and are deposited with the court as an advance on costs when the action is filed.
"Yüzde yirmibeşi aşmamak üzere, dava veya hükmolunacak şeyin değeri yahut paranın belli bir yüzdesi avukatlık ücreti olarak kararlaştırılabilir." ... "Avukatlık asgari ücret tarifesi altında vekalet ücreti kararlaştırılamaz."
"A certain percentage, not exceeding twenty-five per cent, of the value of the action or of the subject matter to be awarded, or of the money, may be agreed as the attorney's fee." ... "An attorney's fee below the minimum attorneyship fee tariff may not be agreed." (Unofficial translation)
The main factors that account for differences in fees among Adana divorce lawyers are the type of action (by mutual consent or contested), the number of claims raised together with the divorce (custody, maintenance, compensation, matrimonial property regime, wedding jewellery), the need to collect evidence and whether the stages of legal remedies are included in the fee. Where the fee has not been agreed or there is no written fee agreement between the parties, in actions and matters whose value cannot be measured in money, under Attorneyship Law Art. 164/4 "avukatlık asgari ücret tarifesi uygulanır." "the minimum attorneyship fee tariff applies." (unofficial translation) Since tariff amounts may change, we do not state a fixed figure on this page; we provide the current amount and a fee proposal specific to your file in writing at the first meeting. Under Attorneyship Law Art. 164, the attorney's fee awarded against the other party at the end of the case belongs to the lawyer. Those whose financial situation does not allow them to cover a lawyer's fee may obtain information from the Adana Bar Association on legal aid (adli yardım, legal assistance arranged through the bar association for those unable to afford a lawyer) and the conditions for applying.
Divorce Actions Directly Affect the Lives of the Parties
A divorce action produces a judgment that determines, for years, the housing, subsistence, education and property arrangements of the spouses and children. Custody and personal relations arrangements determine the child's daily life, maintenance and compensation determine the economic balance, and the liquidation of the matrimonial property regime determines the return on the effort accumulated during the marriage. To prevent losses of rights, to secure the parties' future lives and to help ensure a fair trial process, working with a divorce lawyer in Adana experienced in family law makes it possible to foresee the long-term consequences of the judgment from the outset.
Our Related Family and Divorce Law Services
In summary, for those searching for Adana family law lawyers and family lawyers: in addition to divorce actions, YBS Hukuk provides representation before the Adana Family Courts in the following areas of family law; each area is conducted according to its own statutory provisions and rules of evidence.
Adana Family Law Lawyer
An Adana family law lawyer provides representation, beyond divorce, in all disputes within the jurisdiction of the Family Court, such as termination of an engagement, parentage, adoption, guardianship, the family home and recognition of foreign court decisions. On termination of an engagement, pecuniary compensation is based on TMK Art. 120, non-pecuniary compensation on TMK Art. 121 and the return of gifts on TMK Art. 122. To protect the family home, an annotation in the title deed register may be requested under TMK Art. 194. The jurisdiction of the Family Court derives from Article 4 of Law No. 4787; where it considers it necessary, the court draws on a psychologist, a pedagogue and a social worker (Art. 5).
Adana Divorce by Mutual Consent Lawyer
An Adana divorce by mutual consent lawyer prepares the protocol in files where the spouses agree on the divorce and its consequences, files the action and ensures that the spouses' will is expressed before the judge at the hearing. Under TMK Art. 166/3, the marriage must have lasted at least one year, the spouses must apply jointly or one must accept the other's action, and the judge must hear the parties in person and find the protocol appropriate. The protocol should state clearly the amount of maintenance and the criterion for its increase, the days and hours of custody and personal relations, the division of property and the handover of belongings; vague wording later leads to disputes over adaptation and enforcement. The action is filed with one of the courts of the places listed in TMK Art. 168. For details of the stages, see our guide to the divorce by mutual consent action.
Adana Contested Divorce Lawyer
An Adana contested divorce lawyer proves fault in files where the spouses cannot agree on the divorce or its consequences and links the custody, maintenance and compensation claims to evidence. The action may be based on the grounds of adultery (TMK Art. 161), attempt on life, severe maltreatment or degrading conduct (TMK Art. 162), commission of a degrading offence or living a dishonourable life (TMK Art. 163), abandonment (TMK Art. 164), mental illness (TMK Art. 165) or the fundamental breakdown of the union of marriage (TMK Art. 166/1). Since evidence obtained unlawfully may not be taken into account under HMK Art. 189/2, the evidence plan is built on official records, witnesses and documents to be obtained through the court. Post-divorce maintenance and pecuniary compensation depend on the allocation of fault (TMK Art. 174, Art. 175). For a general account of the subject, see our article on the contested divorce action.
Adana Custody Lawyer
An Adana custody lawyer builds a litigation plan based on the child's interests in actions for the determination of custody on divorce, the arrangement of personal relations and the change of custody after divorce. Under TMK Art. 182/3, in arranging personal relations, the child's interests in terms of health, education and morals are taken as the basis; for the professional assessment, the court draws on a psychologist, a pedagogue and a social worker (Law No. 4787, Art. 5). By its decision 2024/2986 E., 2024/5319 K., the 2nd Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation upheld the decision that took into account the will of the child who had reached the age of discernment and dismissed the request to extend personal relations. In the event of new facts such as the remarriage or relocation of the mother or father, the judge takes the necessary measures (TMK Art. 183). For details, see our articles on the action for change of custody and joint custody.
Adana Maintenance Lawyer
An Adana maintenance lawyer provides representation in actions for the determination, increase, reduction and termination of interim maintenance, post-divorce maintenance and child support, and in the collection of unpaid maintenance. Interim maintenance for the duration of the proceedings is based on TMK Art. 169, post-divorce maintenance on TMK Art. 175 and child support on TMK Art. 182/3; the support of a child who has reached majority and is still in education is regulated in TMK Art. 328/2. Family support maintenance between relatives, on the other hand, is a separate institution in TMK Art. 364. When the financial circumstances of the parties change, an increase or reduction of maintenance may be requested under TMK Art. 176. The decision of the Constitutional Court annulling the phrase "süresiz olarak" "for an indefinite period" (unofficial translation) in TMK Art. 175 will enter into force on 30.06.2027. For unpaid maintenance, coercive imprisonment of up to three months may be requested under Art. 344 of the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Law (İİK). For the calculation of increases, see our article on the action to increase maintenance and its calculation.
Adana Matrimonial Property Regime and Property Division Lawyer
An Adana matrimonial property regime and property division lawyer bases the participation claim, value increase share and contribution share (katkı payı) claims in the liquidation of the regime of participation in acquired property on documents and current values. Each spouse is entitled to half of the other's net surplus (TMK Art. 236/1); personal property is listed in TMK Art. 220 and is not included in the liquidation. The value increase share of a spouse who has contributed to the other spouse's asset without receiving any consideration or adequate consideration is calculated under TMK Art. 227/1 in proportion to the contribution and according to the value of the asset at the time of liquidation. Acquired property is taken into account at its value at the time of liquidation (TMK Art. 235/1); in its decision 2024/10251 E., 2025/12020 K., the 2nd Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation reversed a calculation made on the basis of values from about one and a half years before the date of judgment and required the current market value to be determined as at the date closest to the date of the new judgment following reversal. In a divorce on the ground of adultery or attempt on life, the judge may, under TMK Art. 236/2, reduce or remove, in accordance with equity, the share of the spouse at fault in the net surplus.
Adana Wedding Jewellery Lawyer
An Adana wedding jewellery lawyer proves ownership and handover in actions for the return, or payment of the value, of wedding jewellery such as gold, bracelets, necklaces and money given at the wedding and during the marriage. According to decision 2025/4787 E. 2025/11126 K. of the 2nd Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation, in the absence of an agreement between the parties or of a proven local custom and practice, everything of economic value given to the spouses belongs, as a rule, to them; items specific to women or specific to men belong to that sex, while items suitable for both sexes belong to the spouse on whom they were placed or to whom they were given. In the action, wedding footage, the list of jewellery, witness statements and jeweller or bank records are assessed together; to whom each item was given and with whom it remained must be proven separately.
Adana Pecuniary and Non-Pecuniary Compensation Lawyer
As an Adana lawyer for compensation in divorce, we claim, within the framework of TMK Art. 174, redress for interests impaired by the divorce and for infringement of personality rights. Pecuniary compensation may be claimed by "kusursuz veya daha az kusurlu taraf" "the party not at fault or less at fault" (unofficial translation), and non-pecuniary compensation by "kişilik hakkı saldırıya uğrayan taraf" "the party whose personality rights have been infringed" (unofficial translation) by the events that caused the divorce. Pecuniary compensation may be paid as a lump sum or in the form of periodic payments, whereas non-pecuniary compensation may be paid only as a lump sum (TMK Art. 176). The judge determines the amount at their discretion according to the seriousness of the events and the circumstances of the parties. Under TMK Art. 178, rights of action arising from the termination of the marriage by divorce must be exercised within one year from the finality of the divorce judgment.
Adana Lawyer for Protective Measures under Law No. 6284
An Adana lawyer for protective measures under Law No. 6284 conducts the application for a protective and preventive measure order to be issued and extended, and for its breach to be sanctioned, in the face of violence or a risk of violence. Article 2 of Law No. 6284 defines violence as "fiziksel, cinsel, psikolojik, sözlü veya ekonomik her türlü tutum ve davranış" "any kind of physical, sexual, psychological, verbal or economic attitude and conduct" (unofficial translation); measures are not applied only in cases of physical violence. The judge may order that the person who commits violence be removed from the shared home, not approach the protected person and not disturb the protected person by means of communication (Art. 5/1-b, c, f). Where delay would be detrimental, certain measures may also be taken by the senior law enforcement officer; however, "Hakim tarafından yirmidört saat içinde onaylanmayan tedbirler kendiliğinden kalkar" "measures not approved by the judge within twenty-four hours lapse automatically" (unofficial translation) (Art. 5/2). A measure order is issued for a maximum of six months in the first instance, and for a protective measure "delil veya belge aranmaz" "no evidence or document is required" (unofficial translation) (Art. 8). In the event of a breach of the measure, coercive imprisonment of three to ten days is applied (Art. 13). In files requiring a protective measure, we are available 7/24.
YBS Hukuk | Adana Law Office provides advice and litigation services in family and divorce law at Yenibaraj Mah. Bülent Angın Bulvarı Tamer Apt. No:42 Kat:7 D:19 Seyhan/Adana. At the office, divorce by mutual consent and contested divorce, maintenance, custody, liquidation of the matrimonial property regime, wedding jewellery and compensation files are handled by Av. Yakup Buğrahan SEVDİ; a litigation plan is prepared for each file according to its own circumstances.
For information on divorce or family law, you can reach YBS Hukuk | Adana Law Office 7/24 on 0507 007 0 927 or at destek@ybshukuk.com.tr. Legal steps taken at the right time prevent losses of rights that are difficult to remedy later.
Family and Divorce Law | Comprehensive Information
When choosing a divorce lawyer in Adana, it is necessary to assess together experience suited to the type of file, a written fee agreement and familiarity with current decisions of the Court of Cassation. YBS Hukuk provides legal services as an Adana divorce lawyer in divorce by mutual consent and contested divorce, custody, maintenance, liquidation of the matrimonial property regime and wedding jewellery cases under the provisions of the Turkish Civil Code No. 4721, and follows in its files the current decisions of the Court of Cassation and the regional courts of appeal.
Our Services in Family Law
- Divorce by mutual consent and contested divorce actions
- Liquidation of the matrimonial property regime (contribution share and participation claim)
- Custody and personal relations (contact with the child) actions
- Maintenance actions (interim maintenance, child support, post-divorce maintenance)
- Actions for the return of wedding jewellery and trousseau
- Actions concerning termination of an engagement and the return of gifts
- Actions for pecuniary and non-pecuniary compensation
- Adoption and guardianship proceedings
- Domestic violence and protection orders (Law No. 6284)
- Actions for the change of custody and the rearrangement of personal relations
- Recognition and enforcement of foreign court divorce decisions
- Actions for change of surname and correction of civil registry records
The Divorce Process and Your Legal Rights, Explained by an Adana Divorce Lawyer
Divorce is regulated between Articles 161 and 184 of the Turkish Civil Code No. 4721. For a divorce by mutual consent, the marriage must have lasted at least one year and the spouses must agree on the arrangement concerning the financial consequences of the divorce and the situation of the children (TMK Art. 166/3). In a contested divorce, on the other hand, the ground for divorce and fault are proven; under TMK Art. 184/1, the judge may not regard the facts on which the action is based as proven unless satisfied in conscience of their existence.
In a divorce action, claims for maintenance, custody, division of property and compensation may be raised together. The duration of the proceedings is not determined by law; it is determined by service of process, the collection of evidence, professional assessment and the appeal stages. Our office, which conducts litigation before the Adana Family Courts, shares every step of the file with the client, from the first meeting to the judgment stage.
In the liquidation of the matrimonial property regime, value is calculated on the basis of the value at the time of liquidation (TMK Art. 235/1); in its decision 2024/10251 E. 2025/12020 K., the 2nd Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation required the current market value to be determined as at the date closest to the date of the new judgment following reversal. We also provide legal support to our clients in claims for the return of wedding jewellery, trousseau claims and compensation claims.
On divorce, custody belongs to the party to whom the child is entrusted (TMK Art. 336/3); the law ties the exercise and change of custody to the child's interests (TMK Art. 339/1, Art. 182/2). When arranging personal relations with the spouse who has not been granted custody, the child's interests in terms of health, education and morals are taken as the basis (TMK Art. 182/3). In custody actions, the child's living conditions, educational environment and, for a child who has reached the age of discernment, the child's will are presented to the court together with the professionals' report. We also make urgent applications for protection orders and barring measures under Law No. 6284.
Recent Court of Cassation Decisions | Family Law
Wedding Jewellery Claim | Upheld
In its decision dated 26.11.2025, E. 2025/2332, K. 2025/10271 (Büyükçekmece 6th Family Court; 42nd Civil Chamber of the Istanbul Regional Court of Appeal), the 2nd Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation stated the outcome of the review on appeal to the Court of Cassation as follows:
"Temyizen incelenen karar, tarafların karşılıklı iddia ve savunmalarına, dayandıkları belgelere, uyuşmazlığa uygulanması gereken hukuk kuralları ile hukuki ilişkinin nitelendirilmesine, dava şartlarına, yargılama ve ispat kuralları ile kararda belirtilen gerekçelere göre usul ve kanuna uygun olup temyiz dilekçesinde ileri sürülen nedenler kararın bozulmasını gerektirecek nitelikte görülmemiştir. ... Temyiz olunan Bölge Adliye Mahkemesi kararının 6100 sayılı Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu'nun 370 inci maddesinin birinci fıkrası uyarınca ONANMASINA, ... 26.11.2025 tarihinde oy birliğiyle karar verildi."Unofficial translation
"The judgment examined on appeal to the Court of Cassation is in accordance with procedure and the law, having regard to the mutual claims and defences of the parties, the documents on which they rely, the rules of law to be applied to the dispute and the characterisation of the legal relationship, the conditions of the action, the rules of procedure and evidence and the reasons stated in the judgment, and the grounds raised in the petition for appeal to the Court of Cassation have not been found to be of a nature requiring reversal of the judgment. ... it was decided unanimously on 26.11.2025 that the decision of the Regional Court of Appeal subject to the appeal to the Court of Cassation be UPHELD pursuant to the first paragraph of Article 370 of the Code of Civil Procedure No. 6100, ..."
The action was filed with claims for divorce and wedding jewellery, and the husband appealed to the Court of Cassation against the decision of the Regional Court of Appeal only as regards the determination of fault and the compensation awards. The Court of Cassation upheld the decision under HMK Art. 370/1; the decision contains no reasoning on the ownership of the wedding jewellery. For the rule on the ownership of wedding jewellery, decision 2025/4787 E., 2025/11126 K. above should be taken as the basis. The lesson from the decision is that the points raised in the petition for appeal to the Court of Cassation determine the limits of the review.
Arrangement of Custody and Personal Relations | Upheld
2nd Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation, E. 2024/2986, K. 2024/5319, dated 04.07.2024 (Bursa 12th Family Court; 2nd Civil Chamber of the Bursa Regional Court of Appeal)
"...özellikle idrak çağındaki çocuğun iradesi ile üstün menfaati dikkate alındığında, İlk Derece Mahkemesinin vakıa ve hukuki değerlendirmesinde usul ve esas yönünden yasaya aykırılık bulunmadığı..."Unofficial translation
"...having regard in particular to the will and best interests of the child who has reached the age of discernment, that there was no unlawfulness in terms of procedure or substance in the assessment of the facts and the law by the Court of First Instance..."
For a child whose custody had been granted to the mother, the father requested a change of custody or, failing that, a rearrangement of personal relations. The dispute examined by the Court of Cassation was whether the dismissal of the request to extend the duration of personal relations was correct, and this dismissal was upheld. The quoted sentence is the reasoning of the Regional Court of Appeal; the Court of Cassation unanimously upheld the decision based on this reasoning. The decision is an example of an outcome unfavourable to the parent requesting an extension of personal relations; in such a request, it must be shown concretely that the existing arrangement is contrary to the child's interests.
Determination of Current Value in the Liquidation of the Matrimonial Property Regime | Reversed
In its decision dated 25.12.2025 referred to above (Bursa 7th Family Court; 2nd Civil Chamber of the Bursa Regional Court of Appeal), the 2nd Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation held as follows on the value of the immovable property to be taken as the basis in liquidation:
"...taşınmazın tasfiyede esas alınacak değeri, yasal düzenlemeler ve Dairemizin ilkelerine aykırı şekilde, taşınmazın karar tarihinden (03.05.2024) yaklaşık bir buçuk yıl önceki (Kasım/2022) belirlenen güncel değerlerine göre artık değere katılma alacağının hesaplanması doğru olmamıştır. ... 2. Temyiz olunan İlk Derece Mahkemesi kararının yukarıda (1.b.) ve (1.c.) bentlerinde açıklanan sebeplerle BOZULMASINA, ... 25.12.2025 tarihinde oy birliğiyle karar verildi."Unofficial translation
"...it was not correct, contrary to the statutory provisions and the principles of our Chamber, to calculate the participation claim in the net surplus according to the current values of the immovable property determined about one and a half years (November/2022) before the date of judgment (03.05.2024) as the value of the immovable property to be taken as the basis in liquidation. ... 2. REVERSAL of the judgment of the Court of First Instance subject to the appeal to the Court of Cassation for the reasons explained in subparagraphs (1.b.) and (1.c.) above, ... it was decided unanimously on 25.12.2025."
The Chamber found it erroneous for the valuation to be based on figures from about one and a half years before the date of judgment and reversed the judgment so that the calculation would be made again according to the current market value. In practice, the "tasfiye anındaki değer" "value at the time of liquidation" (unofficial translation) rule in TMK Art. 235/1 translates into a valuation dated close to the date of judgment. When a file lasts a long time or returns after reversal, a request for a new examination by a court-appointed expert may be made on the basis of this decision.
Rectification of Decision in Family Cases | Rejected
2nd Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation, E. 2025/9638, K. 2025/10793, dated 08.12.2025
"...bölge adliye mahkemelerinin göreve başladığı 20.07.2016 tarihinden sonra anılan mahkemelerce verilen kararların temyizi üzerine Yargıtayca tesis edilen kararlar hakkında 6100 sayılı Kanun'da karar düzeltme yoluna başvurulabileceğine dair bir düzenleme bulunmamaktadır."Unofficial translation
"...Law No. 6100 contains no provision allowing an application for rectification of decision against the decisions rendered by the Court of Cassation upon appeal against decisions given by the regional courts of appeal after 20.07.2016, the date on which those courts began to operate."
The petition for rectification of decision filed against the Court of Cassation's decision upholding the judgment in a file concerning a contribution share, value increase share and participation claim was rejected. HMK Provisional Art. 3/2 provides that the old procedure continues to apply to decisions given before the regional courts of appeal began to operate. For this reason, using legal remedies correctly and in time in family cases is a one-time opportunity.
| Subject | Information |
|---|---|
| Legal Basis | Turkish Civil Code No. 4721 (TMK Art. 161 to 184) |
| Court with Subject-Matter Jurisdiction | Family Court (Law No. 4787, Art. 4) |
| Competent Court (Venue) | The domicile of one of the spouses or the place where they have lived together for the last six months (TMK Art. 168) |
| Condition for Divorce by Mutual Consent | The marriage must have lasted at least one year, a joint application or acceptance, and the judge hearing the parties in person (TMK Art. 166/3) |
| Time Limit for Appeal | Two weeks from service of the judgment (HMK Art. 345) |
| Rights of Action Arising from Divorce | One year from the finality of the judgment of divorce (TMK Art. 178) |
| Change of Maintenance | An increase or reduction may be requested when financial circumstances change (TMK Art. 176) |
| Indefinite Maintenance | The annulment of the phrase "süresiz olarak" "for an indefinite period" (unofficial translation) enters into force on 30.06.2027 (Constitutional Court, E. 2025/156, K. 2026/131) |
| Lawyer's Fee | May not be agreed below the Minimum Attorneyship Fee Tariff (Attorneyship Law Art. 164) |
Adana Divorce Lawyer | Types of Maintenance and Calculation
Three types of maintenance relate directly to divorce: interim maintenance paid for the duration of the proceedings (TMK Art. 169), post-divorce maintenance awarded to the spouse who would fall into poverty after the divorce (TMK Art. 175) and child support paid for the child's care and education expenses (TMK Art. 182/3). As an Adana divorce lawyer, in determining the amount of maintenance we submit to the court, with supporting documents, the parties' income, the children's education and health expenses and the standard of living the family maintained during the marriage. You can use our maintenance calculation tool to calculate the increase of current maintenance; we also provide services in actions to increase, reduce and terminate maintenance within the framework of TMK Art. 176.
Divorce decisions given abroad do not automatically produce effects in Türkiye. Under Art. 27/A of the Civil Registration Services Law No. 5490, divorce decisions given by the authorities of a foreign country "Türk kamu düzenine açıkça aykırı bulunmaması şartlarıyla nüfus kütüğüne tescil edilir." "are registered in the civil register on condition that they are not found to be manifestly contrary to Turkish public order." (unofficial translation), provided that the parties apply jointly (or, if one of the parties has died or is a foreign national, the party who is a Turkish citizen applies alone) and that the decision was given by a competent authority and has become final in accordance with the procedure. If these conditions cannot be met, the decision is recognised through an action for recognition or enforcement to be filed with the Family Court. We also provide services on the divorce procedures of Turkish citizens living abroad and on ending marriages with spouses of foreign nationality.
For the most frequently asked questions and answers on divorce and family law, visit our Adana Family Law Frequently Asked Questions page. As an Adana divorce lawyer, we invite you to review all of our family law questions and answers.
Adana Divorce Lawyer: Frequently Asked Questions
How are Adana divorce lawyer fees determined?
Adana divorce lawyer fees are agreed in writing between the lawyer and the client and may not be below the Minimum Attorneyship Fee Tariff published by the Union of Turkish Bar Associations. Under Attorneyship Law Art. 164, "Avukatlık asgari ücret tarifesi altında vekalet ücreti kararlaştırılamaz." "An attorney's fee below the minimum attorneyship fee tariff may not be agreed." (unofficial translation) The fee is determined by the type of action (by mutual consent or contested), the claims raised together with the divorce (custody, maintenance, compensation, matrimonial property regime) and whether the stages of legal remedies are included in its scope. The soundest way to obtain written information specific to your file on Adana divorce lawyers' fees is to speak directly with the office.
Our client Yaren P. asked: How is property divided in a divorce action?
In divorce, if there is no matrimonial property agreement between the spouses, property is divided through the liquidation of the regime of participation in acquired property. Under TMK Art. 202, "Eşler arasında edinilmiş mallara katılma rejiminin uygulanması asıldır." "As a rule, the regime of participation in acquired property applies between spouses." (unofficial translation); and under TMK Art. 236/1, "Her eş veya mirasçıları, diğer eşe ait artık değerin yarısı üzerinde hak sahibi olurlar." "Each spouse or their heirs are entitled to half of the net surplus belonging to the other spouse." (unofficial translation) Property acquired for consideration during the marriage is included in the division; personal property (TMK Art. 220) is not. An Adana property division action may be filed together with the divorce action or separately; documenting acquisition dates and payments prevents losses of rights.
Does the Adana Bar Association provide free lawyer services for divorce actions?
Bar associations offer a legal aid service for persons whose financial situation does not allow them to cover a lawyer's fee; divorce actions may also be considered within this scope. You need to obtain up-to-date information on the application conditions and the documents required from the Adana Bar Association. This is an important option for those looking for a free lawyer through the Adana Bar Association. YBS Hukuk is a law office that works on the basis of written fee agreements.
How long does a divorce by mutual consent action take?
The law does not provide a fixed duration for a divorce by mutual consent; the duration is largely determined by when the court sets the hearing date. Under TMK Art. 166/3, if the marriage has lasted at least one year and the spouses have applied jointly, or one has accepted the other's action, the judge rules for divorce after hearing the parties in person and finding the protocol appropriate. In divorce by mutual consent actions in Adana, preparing the protocol in full and the spouses' attendance at the hearing remove the need for an additional hearing. The judgment becomes final if no appeal is lodged within two weeks of service (HMK Art. 345).
Is the child's view sought in a custody action?
Yes, the will of a child who has reached the age of discernment is one of the criteria taken into account in custody and personal relations actions; however, the decision is made according to the child's interests. By its decision 2024/2986 E., 2024/5319 K., the 2nd Civil Chamber of the Court of Cassation upheld the decision given having regard to "idrak çağındaki çocuğun iradesi ile üstün menfaati" "the will and best interests of the child who has reached the age of discernment" (unofficial translation). On divorce, custody belongs to the party to whom the child is entrusted (TMK Art. 336/3); the law ties the exercise and change of custody to the child's interests (TMK Art. 339/1, Art. 182/2). When arranging personal relations with the spouse who has not been granted custody, under TMK Art. 182/3 the child's "sağlık, eğitim ve ahlak bakımından yararları esas tutulur." "interests in terms of health, education and morals are taken as the basis." (unofficial translation) In an Adana custody action, obtaining support from an Adana Divorce Lawyer makes it possible to request that the child be heard in the presence of a professional and free from any influence.
Where can the telephone numbers or contact details of lawyers in Adana be found?
The most reliable way to verify whether a lawyer is registered with a bar association, and the lawyer's contact details, is the lawyer search sections on the official websites of the Adana Bar Association and the Union of Turkish Bar Associations. In searches such as "Adana bar association lawyer search", "Adana lawyer search", "lawyer lookup Adana" or "Adana Divorce Lawyer Search", turning to these official sources is the correct approach. The same sources should also be relied on for telephone numbers of Adana lawyers and Adana lawyer numbers. You can reach YBS Hukuk 7/24 on 0507 007 0 927.
Our clients ask: What compensation claims can be made in a divorce action?
Pecuniary and non-pecuniary compensation may be claimed in a divorce action. Under TMK Art. 174/1, "Mevcut veya beklenen menfaatleri boşanma yüzünden zedelenen kusursuz veya daha az kusurlu taraf, kusurlu taraftan uygun bir maddi tazminat isteyebilir." "The party not at fault or less at fault whose existing or expected interests are impaired by the divorce may claim appropriate pecuniary compensation from the party at fault." (unofficial translation) Under TMK Art. 174/2, the party whose personality rights have been infringed by the events that caused the divorce may claim from the other party at fault an appropriate sum of money as non-pecuniary compensation. Adana compensation lawyers and Adana Divorce Lawyers set out, with evidence, the events on which these claims are based and observe the one-year period in TMK Art. 178.
In which matters does a family law lawyer in Adana provide support?
An Adana family law lawyer provides advice and representation, in addition to divorce actions, in matters within the jurisdiction of the Family Court such as termination of an engagement, parentage, adoption, guardianship, maintenance, the family home annotation and recognition of foreign court decisions. The jurisdiction of Family Courts is regulated in Article 4 of Law No. 4787 and covers actions and matters arising from Book Two of the TMK. In these files, the privacy of the children and family members is protected.
How can law offices in Adana be found?
The most reliable way to reach law offices in Adana is the list of lawyers and the search section on the official website of the Adana Bar Association. Business information and reviews in search results may give an additional idea; however, the lawyer's bar registration must always be verified from the official source. When choosing among Adana law offices, the office's experience in family law files, a written fee agreement and its communication arrangements should be assessed together.
Is a "Protection Order" under Law No. 6284 applied only in cases of physical violence?
No. Article 2 of Law No. 6284 defines violence as "fiziksel, cinsel, psikolojik, sözlü veya ekonomik her türlü tutum ve davranış" "any kind of physical, sexual, psychological, verbal or economic attitude and conduct" (unofficial translation). Insults, threats, humiliation and economic pressure may also form the basis of a measure order. The judge may order that the person who commits violence be removed from the shared home, not approach the protected person and not disturb the protected person by means of communication (Art. 5/1-b, c, f).
Is inherited property divided on divorce?
No. Under TMK Art. 220, the "sonradan miras yoluyla ya da herhangi bir şekilde karşılıksız kazanma yoluyla elde ettiği malvarlığı değerleri" "assets subsequently acquired by inheritance or otherwise free of charge" (unofficial translation) of one of the spouses are personal property by law and are not included in the calculation of the participation claim. Property acquired in place of inherited property through its sale is also regarded as personal property, falling within "Kişisel mallar yerine geçen değerler" "assets replacing personal property" (unofficial translation). If property was purchased by adding money earned during the marriage to inherited money, the share of each source is calculated separately.
Is property purchased before marriage divided in an action for the division of the matrimonial property regime?
No. Under TMK Art. 220/2, assets "Mal rejiminin başlangıcında eşlerden birine ait bulunan" "belonging to one of the spouses at the beginning of the matrimonial property regime" (unofficial translation) are personal property and are not included in the division on liquidation. However, the income derived from this property during the marriage, such as rental income, is regarded as acquired property under TMK Art. 219 and is included in the division calculation.
Does custody change if a stepmother or stepfather uses violence against the child?
Custody does not change automatically; however, a change of custody or measures to protect the child may be requested. Under TMK Art. 183, "Ana veya babanın başkasıyla evlenmesi, başka bir yere gitmesi veya ölmesi gibi yeni olguların zorunlu kılması halinde hakim, re'sen veya ana ve babadan birinin istemi üzerine gerekli önlemleri alır." "Where new facts, such as the mother or father marrying another person, moving to another place or dying, make it necessary, the judge takes the necessary measures of their own motion or at the request of either parent." (unofficial translation) If there is violence against the child, the measures under Law No. 6284 may also be requested separately. Documenting the violence with reports, official records and witnesses makes it easier for the court to decide quickly.
How is non-pecuniary compensation determined in divorce?
Non-pecuniary compensation is paid to the party whose personality rights have been infringed by the events that caused the divorce, by the other party at fault, as "uygun miktarda bir para" "an appropriate sum of money" (unofficial translation) (TMK Art. 174/2). The judge determines the appropriate amount at their discretion according to the seriousness of the events, the parties' degree of fault and their social and economic circumstances. Non-pecuniary compensation may not be paid in the form of periodic payments; under TMK Art. 176/2, "Manevi tazminatın irat biçiminde ödenmesine karar verilemez." "Payment of non-pecuniary compensation in the form of periodic payments may not be ordered." (unofficial translation)
I divorced abroad; is the divorce valid in Türkiye?
A foreign court decision does not automatically produce effects in Türkiye; registration in the civil register or an action for recognition is required. Under Art. 27/A of the Civil Registration Services Law No. 5490, divorce decisions "Türk kamu düzenine açıkça aykırı bulunmaması şartlarıyla nüfus kütüğüne tescil edilir." "are registered in the civil register on condition that they are not found to be manifestly contrary to Turkish public order." (unofficial translation), provided that the parties apply jointly (or, if one of the parties has died or is a foreign national, the party who is a Turkish citizen applies alone) and that the decision was given by a competent authority and has become final in accordance with the procedure. If the conditions cannot be met, recognition is obtained through an action to be filed with the Family Court under the Law on Private International Law and International Civil Procedure.
Is there imprisonment if maintenance is not paid?
Yes, coercive imprisonment may be requested. Under Enforcement and Bankruptcy Law Art. 344, "Nafakaya ilişkin kararların gereğini yerine getirmeyen borçlunun, alacaklının şikayeti üzerine, üç aya kadar tazyik hapsine karar verilir." "A debtor who fails to comply with decisions concerning maintenance shall, upon the creditor's complaint, be ordered to undergo coercive imprisonment of up to three months." (unofficial translation) Under the same paragraph, "Hapsin tatbikine başlandıktan sonra kararın gereği yerine getirilirse, borçlu tahliye edilir." "If the decision is complied with after the imprisonment has begun, the debtor is released." (unofficial translation) For accumulated maintenance, enforcement proceedings based on the enforceable judgment (ilamlı icra takibi, enforcement on the basis of a court judgment) may also be initiated.
Are WhatsApp and Facebook messages admissible as evidence?
They may be, if they were obtained by lawful means. Under HMK Art. 189/2, "Hukuka aykırı olarak elde edilmiş olan deliller, mahkeme tarafından bir vakıanın ispatında dikkate alınamaz." "Evidence obtained unlawfully may not be taken into account by the court in proving a fact." (unofficial translation) Correspondence accessed by cracking the spouse's phone password or by means of spyware falls within this prohibition and may constitute an offence under TCK Art. 134. Publicly accessible posts and correspondence sent to the person themselves as a party to the message, on the other hand, may be submitted to the court for assessment; which record is to be used should be assessed together with a lawyer before the action is filed.
Is property acquired after the divorce action has been filed divided?
No. Under TMK Art. 225/2, on divorce the matrimonial property regime "dava tarihinden geçerli olmak üzere sona erer" "ends with effect from the date of the action" (unofficial translation); in liquidation, the acquired property existing at the time the regime ends is taken into account (TMK Art. 235/1). Property acquired after the date of the action is not included in the calculation of the participation claim. Assets acquired by inheritance or otherwise free of charge, on the other hand, are personal property by law, regardless of the date (TMK Art. 220/2).
How long does a contested divorce action take in Adana?
The law does not provide a duration for a contested divorce action; the duration of the first instance stage is determined by stages such as service of process, hearing witnesses, obtaining records and the social investigation report. After the judgment, there is a two-week time limit for appeal (HMK Art. 345) and again a two-week time limit for appeal to the Court of Cassation against the decision of the Regional Court of Appeal (HMK Art. 361/1), and these stages are added to the total duration of the proceedings. Setting out the evidence in full in the first petition and giving the witnesses' addresses correctly shorten the proceedings.
What happens if my spouse does not attend the hearing in a divorce action?
The respondent spouse's failure to attend the hearing does not prevent the case from being heard, nor does it amount to an admission against the respondent. Under HMK Art. 128, a respondent who does not submit a statement of defence within the time limit "davacının dava dilekçesinde ileri sürdüğü vakıaların tamamını inkar etmiş sayılır." "is deemed to have denied all the facts asserted by the claimant in the statement of claim." (unofficial translation) Under TMK Art. 184/1, moreover, the judge may not regard the facts on which the divorce is based as proven unless satisfied in conscience of their existence. The claimant spouse must prove the allegations with evidence. In a divorce by mutual consent, on the other hand, since the spouses must be heard in person, a judgment of divorce by mutual consent cannot be given where a spouse does not attend the hearing.
Can a spouse who committed adultery receive maintenance?
Not if their fault is found to be greater. Under TMK Art. 175, post-divorce maintenance is awarded to the requesting party who would fall into poverty because of the divorce, "kusuru daha ağır olmamak koşuluyla" "provided that their fault is not greater" (unofficial translation). The fault of the spouse who committed adultery is compared with the fault of the other spouse; if the fault of the spouse who committed adultery is found to be greater, post-divorce maintenance is not awarded in their favour. In a divorce on the ground of adultery or attempt on life, the judge may also reduce or remove the share of the spouse at fault in the net surplus under TMK Art. 236/2.
Who keeps the wedding jewellery on divorce?
According to the current case law of the Court of Cassation, in the absence of an agreement between the parties or a proven local custom and practice, everything of economic value placed on or given to the woman and the man belongs, as a rule, to them. If the jewellery includes an item specific to women or to men, it is deemed to have been given to that sex; jewellery found to be suitable for both sexes belongs to the spouse on whom it was placed or to whom it was given (Court of Cassation, 2nd Civil Chamber, 2025/4787 E. 2025/11126 K.).
Does the child's age matter in a custody action?
Age affects the child's needs and the extent to which the child's will is taken into account; however, there is no rule in the law granting custody to one parent according to a specific age. On divorce, under TMK Art. 336/3, custody "çocuk kendisine bırakılan tarafa aittir" "belongs to the party to whom the child is entrusted" (unofficial translation); the law ties the exercise and change of custody to the child's interests (TMK Art. 339/1, Art. 182/2). For a young child, the need for care and continuity come to the fore; for a school-age and older child, the educational routine and social environment. The will of a child who has reached the age of discernment is taken into account; however, where the child's best interests so require, the court may decide differently from that will.
What are the conditions for a divorce by mutual consent?
Under TMK Art. 166/3, the marriage must have lasted at least one year, the spouses must apply jointly or one spouse must accept the other's action, and the judge must "tarafları bizzat dinleyerek iradelerinin serbestçe açıklandığına kanaat getirmeli" "hear the parties in person and be satisfied that their will has been expressed freely" (unofficial translation). In addition, it is a condition that the judge "boşanmanın mali sonuçları ile çocukların durumu hususunda taraflarca kabul edilecek düzenlemeyi uygun bulması" "find appropriate the arrangement to be accepted by the parties concerning the financial consequences of the divorce and the situation of the children" (unofficial translation); the judge may amend this arrangement, and if the amendments are accepted by the parties, divorce is ordered.
What is a "Family Home Annotation" and how is it entered?
The family home annotation is a land register entry intended to prevent the family home from being transferred, or the rights over it from being restricted, without the other spouse's express consent. Under TMK Art. 194/1, one spouse may not transfer the family home or restrict the rights over the family home without the express consent of the other spouse. Under TMK Art. 194/3, "Aile konutu olarak özgülenen taşınmaz malın maliki olmayan eş, tapu kütüğüne konutla ilgili gerekli şerhin verilmesini tapu müdürlüğünden isteyebilir." "The spouse who is not the owner of the immovable property allocated as the family home may request the land registry office to enter the necessary annotation concerning the home in the title deed register." (unofficial translation) The application is made to the land registry office; up-to-date information on the documents required should be obtained from the land registry office.
What should you look for when choosing the right divorce lawyer in Adana?
When looking for the right divorce lawyer in Adana, you should assess together the bar registration, the lawyer's experience before the Family Court (custody, matrimonial property regime, wedding jewellery and Law No. 6284 files), whether the scope of the fee is specified item by item in a written agreement, and who will keep you informed about the file and how. Attorneyship Law Art. 164 prohibits agreeing a fee below the minimum fee tariff. An assessment that promises an outcome or makes firm promises about duration or amount does not reflect the state of the evidence in the file; an experienced divorce lawyer states the favourable and unfavourable possibilities together.